SEROLOGY OF RUBELLA AND SURVEILLANCE OF CONGENITAL RUBELLA SYNDROME IN HANOI WHERE AN OUTBREAK HAS OCCURRED

, , , , , ,

##plugins.themes.vojs.article.main##

Abstract

Congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) is preventable illness but stays frequent in developing countries where rubella vaccination is not incorporated in national program of vaccination. Objectives: This study aimed at obtaining baseline information on acquired immunization status of school girls as well as the rate of susceptibility and rubella infection in pregnant women around a rubella outbreak in Hanoi. Methods@ During and after the rubella outbreak in 2011, sera from 136 school girls were tested for rubella-specifi c IgG (Rs-IgG) and 140 pregnant women were tested for rubella-specifi c IgG and for rubella-specifi c IgM (Rs-IgM) using electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) (Roche Diagnostic) with cut-off value 10 IU/mL for IgG and 0.3 IU/mL for IgM. During the surveillance period, 113 infants were identifi ed with confi rmed CRS and clinically analyzed. Results: Rs-IgG antibodies was positive in 125/136 (91.9%) school girls and 119/140 (85%) pregnant
women, with strong-to-extreme concentration in 86/136 (63.2%) school girls versus 19/140
(13.6%) in pregnant women (p<0.002). Rs-IgG was negative in 21/140 (15%) and Rs-IgM
antibodies was positive in 27.9% (39/140) pregnant women, of whom 38 (27.1%) a co-existence of Rs-IgG and Rs-IgM were documented. During the surveillance period 113 infants were identifi ed with confi rmed CRS. Clinical manifestations of CRS included low birth weight <2,500g (86%), congenital heart disease (63.7%), hearing impairment (63.7%), ophthalmological involvement (46.9%). Other clinical features included: thrombocytopenia (85%), neonatal purpura (74.3%), splenomegaly (63.7%), hepatomegaly (62.8%) and blueberry muffi n rash (61.1%). During the surveillance period the estimated annual incidence of CRS was 1.13/1,000
live birth (95% CI 0.92-1.34). Conclusion:
This preliminary, baseline per/post epidemic information showed a high rate of acquired
immunization in female adolescents but also high rate of susceptibility and very high rate of
rubella infection in pregnant women, as well as a very high burden of CRS in Vietnam.

##plugins.themes.vojs.article.details##

References

1. Mi ller E, Cradock-Watson JE, and Pollock TM
(1982). Consequences of confirmed maternal
rubella at successive stages of pregnancy. Lancet
2: 781–784.
2. Robe rtson SE, Featherstone DA, Gacic-Dobo
M, Hersh BS (2003). Rubella and congenital rubella
syndrome: global update. Rev Panam Salud
Publica/Pan Am J Public Health14(5)/306-15.
3. Cut t s FT, Robertson SE, Diaz-Ortega JL,
Samuel R (1997). Control of rubella and congenital
rubella syndrome (CRS) in developing countries.
Part 1: burden of disease from CRS. Bulletin of
WHO; 75(1): 55-68.
4. WHO (2000). Preventing congenital rubella
syndrome. In: Weekly epidemiological record No
36, 75: 290-295.
5. Vo M inh Tuan, Pham Quang Nhat (2010).
Rubella infection rate and risk factors during
the first trimester of pregnancy in young
women admitted in Tudu obstetric hospital. J Med
(Hochiminh City), 14 (Suppl 1): 277-283.
6. Miya kawa M, Yoshino H, Yoshida LM,
Vynnycky E, Motomura H, Tho Le H, Thiem
VD, Ariyoshi K, Anh DD, Moriuchi H (2014).
Seroprevalence of rubella in the cord blood of
pregnant women and congenital rubella incidence
in Nha Trang, Vietnam. Vaccine. 32(10): 1192-8.
7. Nguyen Van Thuong, Trieu Thi Thai, Phung
Nha Hanh, Nguyen Van Bang (2012). Congenital
rubella syndrome in Hanoi after the 2011 rubella
outbreak. J Med Res 80 (Suppl 3A): 165-18. Hung -Fu Tseng, Chen-Kang Chang,
Hsiu-Fen Tan, Shu-Er Yang, Hsueh-Wei Chang
(2006). Seroepidemiology study of rubella antibodies
among pregnant women from seven Asian countries:
Evaluation of the rubella vaccination program in
Taiwan. Vaccine 24: 5772-5777.
9. B est, JM, O’Shea S, Tipples G, Davies N,
Al-Khusalby SM, Krause A, Hesketh LM, Jin L,
Enders G (2002). Interpretation of rubella serology
in pregnancy-pitfalls and problems. BMJ 325:
147-148.
10. Cent er for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) (2001). Control and Prevention of Rubella:
Evaluation and Management of Suspected
Outbreaks, Rubella in Pregnant Women and
Surveillance for Congenital Rubella Syndrome.
Recommendations and Reports50(RR12): 1-23.
11. Nguy en Quang Bac (2011) Congenital
rubella syndrome in babies born to mothers
confi rmed and suspected for rubella infection
admitted in National Hospital of Gynecology and
Obstetrics. J Prac Med (Vietnamese), 792: 12-14.
12. Link ert PK, Sesterhenn G, Arold R, Zenner
HP (1990). Evaluation of otoacoutic emission in
high-risk infants by using an easy and rapid
objective auditory screening method. Eur Arch
Otorhinolaryngol 267(10): 356-360.
13. Give ns KT, Lee DA, Jones T, and Ilstrup DM
(1993). Congenital rubella syndrome: Ophthalmic
manifestations and associated systemic disorders”.
Br J Ophthalmol 77: 358-363. 70.